Welcome
Welcome to freebritannia

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. In addition, registered members also see less advertisements. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Moaning, groaning, griping, scornful negativity and petulant cynicism

Moderators: Bestbear, Morris

Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Morris » Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:55 am

Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

http://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/4 ... ament.html
User avatar
Morris
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:09 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Smaug » Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:16 pm

I've never heard of this petition. With only 1400 signatories it would be irrelevent in any case.
Smaug
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 6:36 am

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby ScepticTone » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:45 pm

Stuff like 9/11 conspiracy theories are very important to some people.

All 1400 of them.

So don't mock Morris.

It's Pivotal, OK?

I forget the number of petitions to Parliament to have Loch Ness drained & the water sent to Southern England, so they can waste more water on their leafy gardens, jakuzzis & golf courses & washing themselves or making their pissy beer or whatever they do there, whilst simultaneously exposing the Loch Ness Monster floundering & flapping about in mud & empty whisky bottles at the bottom of a filthy little lake, but they are of equal importance to conspiracy/mystery theorists.

Pivotal in fact.
User avatar
ScepticTone
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:30 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Big Jake » Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:08 am

By Jove Uncle Tone...... When you're right you're damn right. ;)
User avatar
Big Jake
 
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Morris » Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:02 am

Tone, you may be interested to read about the military officers who also question the official account of 911:

http://patriotsquestion911.com/Article% ... %20911.pdf

Then again, you probably won't, since you have already decided to swallow the official story, despte its inconsistencies.
User avatar
Morris
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:09 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby ScepticTone » Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:31 pm

I don't swallow anything except stuff I can see with my eyes beforehand, Morris.

I'm sceptical, you see.

But not so sceptical as to deconstruct an explosive event clearly captured by several cameras ( I hesitate to use the adjective 'multiple' in this context ), backed up by many eye witnesses, but frankly being more sceptical of the US government's ability to mount such a gigantic putative scam as the conspiracy theorists suggest & actually carry it off, as they seem mostly (as with most governments) unable to run a pissup in a brewery.
User avatar
ScepticTone
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:30 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Morris » Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:49 am

Who mentioned the US government ?
User avatar
Morris
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:09 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Big Jake » Sat Feb 25, 2012 11:27 am

ScepticTone wrote: unable to run a pissup in a brewery.


Is that what they refer to as a Cockney phrase? How does that translate in English?
User avatar
Big Jake
 
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby ScepticTone » Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:03 pm

Big Jake wrote:
ScepticTone wrote: unable to run a pissup in a brewery.


Is that what they refer to as a Cockney phrase? How does that translate in English?


No, it's not a Cockney phrase, but one that's generically British (& Australian). I elided the word 'piss' & 'up' as that's how it's pronounced in English. As one quick pithy word.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... %20brewery
User avatar
ScepticTone
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:30 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Smaug » Sat Feb 25, 2012 11:58 pm

Canadians use 'pissed' but not pissup or 'on the piss', those are English English.

Bender is Canadian English for pissup.

Americans don't have colourfull slang for drunk and disorderly as they cannot handle alchohol without gunplay. :D
Smaug
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 6:36 am

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Big Jake » Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:42 am

Smaug wrote:Americans don't have colourfull slang for drunk and disorderly....

Yep, the Brits definitely have the edge there.......... though when it comes to conspiracies, I might add that some of these truther theories are a "dog's bollocks" if you get my drift.
Smaug wrote:as they cannot handle alchohol without gunplay. :D

Well sir, since "runnin a pissup" means getting drunk in a brewery and not urinating in one (and that even this elementary feat is apparently something my government is incapable of)I could see where a little gunplay might come in handy! ;)
User avatar
Big Jake
 
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Smaug » Sun Feb 26, 2012 6:39 am

Big Jake wrote:
Smaug wrote:Americans don't have colourfull slang for drunk and disorderly....

Yep, the Brits definitely have the edge there.......... though when it comes to conspiracies, I might add that some of these truther theories are a "dog's bollocks" if you get my drift.
Smaug wrote:as they cannot handle alchohol without gunplay. :D

Well sir, since "runnin a pissup" means getting drunk in a brewery and not urinating in one (and that even this elementary feat is apparently something my government is incapable of)I could see where a little gunplay might come in handy! ;)


A little gunplay never hurt anyone. Bullets on the other hand, now they sting a bit. :D

I have to agree these 911 truthers are a bit out there. I have serious doubts about the 'truther' statements that are the subject of this thread. Why petition the Canadian parliament over an a matter that is clearly American? It doesn't make sense, especially considering the Canadian Parliament has completely ignored petitions with hundreds of thousands of signatures, never mind one signed by fourteen hundred engineers trying to convince us the planes we watched flying into the WTC were just a 'cover'.
Smaug
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 6:36 am

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Bestbear » Sun Feb 26, 2012 6:52 pm

Big Jake wrote:
Smaug wrote:Americans don't have colourfull slang for drunk and disorderly....

Yep, the Brits definitely have the edge there.......... though when it comes to conspiracies, I might add that some of these truther theories are a "dog's bollocks" if you get my drift.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Here in the Motherland, "the dog's bollocks" is an expression of admiration for something! As in "that Glock 9mm really is the dog's bollocks!" I suppose this is because The Dog values this part of his anatomy above all else, and spends some time cleaning and grooming in that region ...
Bestbear
 
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 9:13 am

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Bulldog » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:39 pm

In a town in the country in which I am soon to become resident (maybe), there is a rock and roll band made up of local British ski instructors and bar owners. It's been going for 20 or 30 years (with an ever changing line up).

They are called "The Dogs Bollocks" and they are truly, truly appalling.
When the government's boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence – Gary Lloyd
User avatar
Bulldog
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:32 am

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Bulldog » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:40 pm

Bestbear wrote:The Dog values this part of his anatomy above all else, and spends some time cleaning and grooming in that region ...



Too right! :lol:
When the government's boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence – Gary Lloyd
User avatar
Bulldog
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:32 am

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Big Jake » Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:30 pm

Bestbear wrote: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Here in the Motherland, "the dog's bollocks" is an expression of admiration for something! As in "that Glock 9mm really is the dog's bollocks!" I suppose this is because The Dog values this part of his anatomy above all else, and spends some time cleaning and grooming in that region ...


It would seem that we, hear in the former colonies, have a knack for misapplication. (Don't everyone chime in at once.) I suspect something was lost in translation (my British English - American English dictionary may be outdated). Accordingly my application was not so much from the point of admiration but along the lines of "something really fantastic or extraordinary" as in the breadth and scope of the truther theories though (like a dog licking itself) truthers do relish such far fetched possibilities and equally the sight of their obsession is likewise rather appalling to the rest of us.

Thanks for the correction. It's duly noted.
Just to be thorough: Truck = Lorry, Pants = Underwear and 911 = 999.


Apologies to the thread author but as an aside, when did piss come to mean drunk?
User avatar
Big Jake
 
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby ScepticTone » Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:42 pm

Big Jake wrote:[color=#0000FF]Well sir, since "runnin a pissup" means getting drunk in a brewery and not urinating in one


Not quite there yet, BJ. You can have a piss up anywhere: at home, in the pub, in the park, at your auntie's house. A piss up is anywhere a group of people get together solely with the intention of getting pissed.

So, as a brewery is full of lots of beer, it's blindingly easy to get pissed there so......

& piss in English doesn't equate to drunk. It just equates to piss. 'Pissed', however, means drunk, colloquially.

Different from 'pissed off', which means the same as it does in american.

& 'Dog's bollocks' is a term of the utmost admiration, as in:

"My new 56" plasma with 500 watt home cinema is the fucking dog's bollocks, mate. You'll have to come round one night & we'll all have a pissup."

The etymology of the English word 'piss' is probably Norman, as the verb's almost identical in French, (pisser) & a 'pissoir' is an urinal in French. However, it's the same in German & Scandinavian languages too, so I think there's a bit of assonance or alliteration going on there in the word. But I suspect the colloquial us of the word 'pissed' to denote drunk, similar to our use of 'bladdered' to mean the same thing derives from the unfortunate effect of sometimes inadvertantly pissing your pants when extremely rat-arsed. Which probably led to the term 'pissed off', meaning rather annoyed, when you piss your pants. Possibly.

OK, I'll get my coat......
User avatar
ScepticTone
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:30 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Bulldog » Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:01 pm

I presume that "Pissed" came to mean drunk as when we imbibe to excess we tend to produce more output at the other end.

"Pissed as a newt" is an interesting one.

As I understand it, "newt" doesn't refer to the pond dwelling amphibian but to professional mourners who in earlier times were paid to attend funerals to get the numbers up. Apparently they would often over indulge at the wake, hence the expression.
When the government's boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence – Gary Lloyd
User avatar
Bulldog
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:32 am

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Smaug » Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:26 am

I don't know about pissed as a newt, but I have been pissed as a nit.


Dog's bollocks is cat's ass :lol:
Smaug
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 6:36 am

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Bulldog » Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:56 pm

Smaug wrote:Dog's bollocks is cat's ass :lol:



Those of us with an above average grasp on the language tend to go for the polite versions....

"Mutts nuts"

or

"Doggies danglers"
When the government's boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence – Gary Lloyd
User avatar
Bulldog
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:32 am

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Big Jake » Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:52 pm

Jeeze Louise, this is more than an inquiring yank can keep up with..........
My reference library about Brit stuff clearly states that a gentleman would use the phrase "bee's knees" while polite blokes from the north might say, "that's champion, that is." or are these outdated too?

"Totally Awesome" seems to be sufficient for most yanks although some southerners might throw out an occasional, "Yee Doggies!" which might be a distant off shoot your Dog's Bollocks......

With all these colorful offerings (I'm sure we've just scratched the surface) from across the pond, It appears that getting pissed in breweries has taken a toll on British society! ;)
User avatar
Big Jake
 
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Bulldog » Mon Feb 27, 2012 4:48 pm

Simply spiffing.... wot!

Top hole!

Tickety-boo old chap!


No-wha-aye-meen?
When the government's boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence – Gary Lloyd
User avatar
Bulldog
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:32 am

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby ScepticTone » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:35 pm

Big Jake wrote:Jeeze Louise, this is more than an inquiring yank can keep up with..........
My reference library about Brit stuff clearly states that a gentleman would use the phrase "bee's knees" while polite blokes from the north might say, "that's champion, that is." or are these outdated too?

"Totally Awesome" seems to be sufficient for most yanks although some southerners might throw out an occasional, "Yee Doggies!" which might be a distant off shoot your Dog's Bollocks......

With all these colorful offerings (I'm sure we've just scratched the surface) from across the pond, It appears that getting pissed in breweries has taken a toll on British society! ;)


Er, 'bees knees' & 'champion' are, as class-based English qualitative colloquial linguistic delineators, a bit 1950's, BJ. & certainly wouldn't be used today, without heavy irony implied. Dear boy. ;)

Stop watching black & white British films about the war, & watch "Trainspotting" or something similar.

I like this thread.

It's the dog's bollocks.
User avatar
ScepticTone
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:30 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Bulldog » Mon Feb 27, 2012 7:13 pm

ScepticTone wrote:It's the dog's bollocks.



The Greyhound's Gonads Tone!
When the government's boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence – Gary Lloyd
User avatar
Bulldog
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:32 am

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Smaug » Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:42 pm

Bulldog wrote:

Those of us with an above average grasp on the language tend to go for the polite versions....

"Mutts nuts"

or

"Doggies danglers"


Mutts nuts. Hmm, I am going to introduce that into the Western Canadian lexicon.

Here is a slang expression I bet no one else on this thread has heard before: Poontang.
Smaug
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 6:36 am

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Morris » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:01 pm

Poontang, I use that word as often as I can, love it....
User avatar
Morris
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:09 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Smaug » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:13 pm

Morris wrote:Poontang, I use that word as often as I can, love it....



No way! Your kidding right?
Smaug
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 6:36 am

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Big Jake » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:13 pm

Smaug wrote:Here is a slang expression I bet no one else on this thread has heard before: Poontang.


Now now gents...... there are ladies that visit this forum.
User avatar
Big Jake
 
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby Morris » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:45 pm

User avatar
Morris
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:09 pm

Re: Pivotal 9/11 Petition Confronts Canadian Parliament

Postby ScepticTone » Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:12 pm

Morris wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ


No thanks.

It contains little pertaining to poontangs, other than those who made it, or believe the message. However.....

Poontang seems a bit of a longwinded way of describing a muff.
User avatar
ScepticTone
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:30 pm


Return to Free Britannia Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron
suspicion-preferred